Allahabad High Court
JITENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- AVNISH SAXENA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed as infructuous because the bail had already been granted.
Summary
The applicant Jitendra Singh filed a bail cancellation application (No. 330 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking to cancel his interim bail. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application had become infructuous because the bail had already been granted finally. The court examined the status of the bail and found that there was no pending interim bail to cancel. Consequently, the court held that the bail cancellation application was moot. The application was therefore dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail cancellation application is maintainable when the bail has already been granted finally
Subjects
- bail
- bail cancellation
- interim bail
- infructuous application
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 330 of 2026
Jitendra Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Onkar Nath
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
1. Sri Brijesh Kumar, learned counsel holding brief for accused applicant
and learned AGA for State, are present.
2. Learned counsel for accused applicant submits that this is the bail
cancellation application, which has become infructuous as he has sought
cancellation of interim bail and bail application has finally been granted.
3. Accordingly, this bail cancellation application is dismissed as
infructuous.
(Avnish Saxena,J.)
September 8, 2026
Sharad/-
Digitally signed by :-
SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…