Allahabad High Court
RAM RAHEESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Ram Raheesh filed a bail cancellation application (No. 420 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Radhey Shyam Yadav, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel, G.A., was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and, under procedural rules, dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No merits of the bail cancellation were considered. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vivek Varma on October 1, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the procedural consequence when an applicant's counsel fails to appear to press a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
- court procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 420 of 2025
Ram Raheesh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Radhey Shyam Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…