Allahabad High Court
RAM RAHEESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear or be represented.
Summary
The applicant, Ram Raheesh, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 428 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's counsel, A.G.A. V.P. Tripathi, was present, but this did not affect the dismissal. The order was pronounced on October 1, 2026, by Justice Vivek Varma.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant fails to appear or be represented for a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- want of prosecution
- application dismissed
- court procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 428 of 2025
Ram Raheesh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Radhey Shyam Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…