Allahabad High Court
AMANULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Amanullah Khan, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 446 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application. The court noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's brief holder, Sri Nagendra Kumar Mishra, was present. No substantive merits of the bail cancellation were considered due to procedural default.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant's counsel fails to appear to prosecute a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- want of prosecution
- absence of counsel
- application dismissed
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 446 of 2025
Amanullah Khan
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praful Dev Shukla, Rishi Kant Rai
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ravindra Prakash Srivastava
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Nagendra Kumar Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State is
present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…