Allahabad High Court
SHIKHA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Shikha Sharma filed an application for cancellation of bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's brief holder, Sri Nagendra Kumar Mishra, was present. The order was pronounced on October 1, 2026, and the application was dismissed without further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail cancellation application can be dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant's counsel does not appear?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 456 of 2025
Shikha Sharma
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayuri Mehrotra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Nagendra Kumar Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State is
present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…