Allahabad High Court
SMT NISHA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant’s failure to appear through counsel.
Summary
Smt Nisha Yadav filed an application for cancellation of bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State’s brief holder, Sri Nagendra Mishra, was present. The dismissal was entered by Justice Vivek Varma on October 1, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the procedural consequence when an applicant’s counsel fails to appear to prosecute a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- want of prosecution
- application dismissed
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 465 of 2025
Smt Nisha Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brij Bhushan Upadhyay
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ram Sagar Yadav, G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Nagendra Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State is present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…