Allahabad High Court
SHIV PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's absence.
Summary
Shiv Prasad filed a bail cancellation application (No. 470 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Nitish Shakya, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the bail cancellation were considered. The dismissal was recorded on October 1, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the procedural consequence when an applicant's counsel fails to appear to prosecute a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 470 of 2025
Shiv Prasad
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nitish Shakya
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shashank Mishra, Shravan
Kumar Mishra
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Anupam Anand, learned Brief Holder for the State is present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…