Allahabad High Court
ZEENAT QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Zeenat Quraishi filed a bail cancellation application (No. 499 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's brief holder, Yogendra Kumar Mishra, was present. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vivek Varma on October 1, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant's counsel does not appear to prosecute a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 499 of 2025
Zeenat Quraishi
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harendra Yadav, Prabhat Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashutosh Jaiswal, G.A., Umesh
Chandra Shukla
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Yogendra Kumar Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State is
present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…