Allahabad High Court
SMT NASTAEEM PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
An application for bail cancellation will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the applicant is not represented before the court.
Summary
Smt Nastaeem Parveen filed a bail cancellation application (No. 502 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. The applicant's counsel, Tarun Kedar Nath Singh and Umesh Singh, did not appear to press the application. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant. Consequently, the court dismissed the application on the ground of want of prosecution. The brief holder for the State, Yogendra Kumar Mishra, was present, but no further arguments were made.
Issues considered
- What is the procedural consequence when an applicant's counsel fails to appear to prosecute a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- procedural default
- want of prosecution
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 502 of 2025
Smt Nastaeem Parveen
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tarun Kedar Nath Singh, Umesh Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sandeep Tripathi
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Yogendra Kumar Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State is
present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…