Allahabad High Court
ASHOK KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's counsel not appearing.
Summary
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Patel, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 504 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The application was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the matter. Consequently, the court noted the absence of prosecution. The learned judge dismissed the application on the ground of want of prosecution. The State's brief holder, Yogendra Kumar Mishra, was present, but no further arguments were made.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant's counsel fails to appear for a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 504 of 2025
Ashok Kumar Patel
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brajesh, Mohd Achhay, Sanju Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anurag Mishra, G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Yogendra Kumar Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State is
present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…