Allahabad High Court
XversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant filed a bail cancellation application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vivek Varma. No substantive merits were considered. The application was therefore rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail cancellation application can be entertained in the absence of the applicant or his counsel?
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- application dismissal
- want of prosecution
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 508 of 2025
X
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyam Narayan
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, G.A.,
Subham Singh
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…