Allahabad High Court
SMT. KUSUMLATAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Smt. Kusumlata filed a bail cancellation application (No. 511 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Ugrasen Kumar Pandey, failed to appear to press the application. No other representative appeared on behalf of the applicant. The court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's counsel, Birendra Singh Khokher, G.A., and the Additional Government Advocate were present, but their presence did not affect the dismissal.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant's counsel does not appear to prosecute a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- procedural default
- want of prosecution
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 511 of 2025
Smt. Kusumlata
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ugrasen Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Birendra Singh Khokher, G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…