Allahabad High Court
MUSTKEEMversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Mustkeem, filed a bail cancellation application (Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 77 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's Additional Government Advocate, Sri V.P. Tripathi, was present. No substantive merits of the bail cancellation were considered due to the procedural lapse.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural consequence when an applicant fails to appear or be represented for a bail cancellation application?
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 77 of 2026
Mustkeem
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Umair Alam
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the
applicant to press the instant application.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
October 1, 2026
Vandana
Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…