Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DILIP KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

In a bail cancellation application (No. 821 of 2023), the petitioner Dilip Kumar Yadav sought to have his bail cancelled. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no representative appeared on behalf of the applicant or the informant. The State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed that the applicant failed to prosecute the application. Consequently, Justice Harvir Singh dismissed the bail cancellation application for want of prosecution. The dismissal left the bail order in force.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail cancellation application can proceed in the absence of the applicant or his representative.
  • Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Subjects

  • bail cancellation
  • want of prosecution
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                        CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 821 of 2023

                                    Dilip Kumar Yadav
                                                                                              .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                                                       Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)              :    Arvind Prabodh Dubey
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)         :    G.A., Tarkeshwar Mishra

                                    Court No. - 70
                                                         HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

                                    1. List has been revised.

                                    2. None appeared on behalf of the applicant / informant to press this bail
                                    cancellation application, however learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

                                    3. Hence, the bail cancellation applicant is dismissed for want of
                                    prosecution.


                                                                                            (Harvir Singh,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Faridul




Digitally signed by :-
FAREEDUL HASAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.