Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

M/S. PRASOON KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusMAHENDRA PRASAD, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY URBAN DISTRIBUTION DIVISION, PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VIT

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is dismissed as infructuous because the writ court’s order was complied with.

Summary

The writ court ordered the opposite party, an executive engineer of a electricity distribution company, to correct an electricity bill dated 12‑12‑2023. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 5‑May‑2025 stating that the corrected bill had been issued and attached the corrected bill and the applicant’s affidavit. The applicant then filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance. The court examined the compliance affidavit and found that the order had indeed been complied with. Consequently, the contempt application was deemed infructuous and was dismissed, with the contempt notice discharged.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt application is maintainable when the order of the writ court has been complied with.

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • writ compliance
  • electricity bill correction
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1328 of 2025

                                    M/S. Prasoon Kumar And Another
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus


                                    Mahendra Prasad, Executive Engineer, Electricity
                                    Urban Distribution Division, Purvanchal Vidyut
                                    Vitaran Nigam Ltd., Tagore Town And Another                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)               :   P.K. Upadhyay
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)          :   Manoj Kumar Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. The writ Court had required the opposite party for correction of
                                    electricity bill dated 12.12.2023.

                                    2. In the compliance affidavit filed by the opposite party on 5.5.2025 it
                                    has been stated that the order of writ Court has been complied with and
                                    corrected bill has been issued to the applicant and applicant has also filed
                                    an affidavit, copy of corrected bill and affidavit of applicant have been
                                    appended as annexure Nos. 1and 2 to the compliance affidavit.

                                    3. As the order of writ Court has been complied by the opposite party,
                                    contempt application has rendered infructuous and same stands dismissed.
                                    Contempt notice stands discharged.



                                                                                   (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    April 10, 2026
                                    Shekhar




Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.