Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PRASHANT KUMAR AGRAWALversusSHRI AMAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CIVIL JUDGE (S.D.)

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is disposed of, with the Court directing the officer to conclude the proceedings expeditiously.

Summary

Prashant Kumar Agrawal filed a contempt application against Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aman Kumar Srivastava, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The High Court examined the instructions dated 26 March 2026 issued by the Civil Judge, which indicated that the proceedings were being conducted on a day‑to‑day basis. The Court found that the judge was actively proceeding with the matter and there was no willful disobedience warranting contempt. Consequently, the Court disposed of the contempt application but directed the officer to conclude the pending proceedings as expeditiously as possible and to comply with the writ court’s order. The judgment was delivered by Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal on 20 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Civil Judge's conduct amounts to contempt of court for alleged delay in complying with a writ order

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • civil procedure
  • writ jurisdiction
  • expeditious disposal

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1651 of 2026

                                    Prashant Kumar Agrawal
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Shri Aman Kumar Srivastava, Civil Judge (S.D.)
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Rishi Kant Rai, Shashank Shekhar Rai
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                     HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. The instructions of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prayagraj dated
                                    26.03.2026 has been received.

                                    2. I have perused the said instructions. From the perusal of the
                                    instructions, it is clear that the officer is proceedings in the matter on day-
                                    to-day basis.

                                    3. In view of the said report, the contempt application stands disposed of
                                    requiring the officer concerned to conclude the proceedings as
                                    expeditiously as possible and comply the order of the writ Court.



                                                                                     (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    A. V. Singh




Digitally signed by :-
AJAY VIKRAM SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.