Allahabad High Court
RADHEY SHYAM YADAVversusS.N. SINGH POSTED AS DISTRICT BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
- Bench
- SAURABH LAVANIA
Holding
The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Radhey Shyam Yadav, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel for the applicant appeared, and no request for adjournment was made. The respondent's counsel, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, was present. The Court observed that the application lacked prosecution and therefore dismissed it. Consequently, any notice issued to the respondent was discharged.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt application should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- contempt
- civil procedure
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 183 of 2012
Radhey Shyam Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
S.N. Singh Posted As District Basic Shiksha
Adhikari And Ors. .....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Aslam Beg, Amit Bose, Prachi
Shukla, Shashank Shukla, V V Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : D.R. Misra, Jyotinjay Verma, Neeraj
Chaurasia, R.P. Verma, Uday Veer
Singh
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Neither the learned counsels for the applicant are present nor any request
has been made on their behalf for adjournment of the case whereas Dr. Uday
Veer Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 14 is present.
3. The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Notice, if any, issued to the respondent, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
October 8, 2025
Satish
Digitally signed by :-
SATISH KUMAR BHARATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…