Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARUN KUMAR SINGH and ORS.versusSRI RAVINDRA KUMAR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UNNAO and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Holding

The contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners filed a civil contempt application (No. 1893 of 2020) against the District Magistrate, Unnao and others. At the hearing on 10 January 2024, no petitioner appeared, though the State’s standing counsel was present. The Court observed that the passage of time had rendered the contempt petition infructuous. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the petition as having become infructuous and discharged the contempt notices. The Court directed that, if the petitioners still consider the cause of action alive, they may file an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil contempt petition that remains unpresented for an extended period becomes infructuous
  • Whether the Court may dismiss such a petition on the ground of infructuity

Subjects

  • civil contempt
  • infructuous petition
  • procedural lapse
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • District Magistrate
  • contempt notices

Judgment

                                                            Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:2931

                                         Court No. - 19

                                         Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1893 of
                                         2020

                                         Applicant :- Arun Kumar Singh And Ors.
                                         Opposite Party :- Sri Ravindra Kumar District Magistrate
                                         Unnao And Ors.
                                         Counsel for Applicant :- Farooqahmad,Rahmatullah Khan
                                         Counsel for Opposite Party :- Varun Pandey

                                         Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

                                         Case called out.

                                         None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing
                                         Counsel for the State is present.

                                         It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has
                                         become infructuous.

                                         Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having
                                         become infructuous.

                                         Contempt notices are hereby discharged.

                                         If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, he
                                         may move an application for recall of the order within eight
                                         weeks.

                                         Consigned to record.

                                         Order Date :- 10.1.2024
                                         Mayank




Digitally signed by :-
MAYANK PRATAP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.