Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. SONI DEVIversusDR. SURYA PRAKASH SINGH, DISTT. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, UNNAO

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Holding

The contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) heard a civil contempt application filed by Smt. Soni Devi against Dr. Surya Prakash Singh, District Inspector of Schools, Unnao. The applicant was represented by counsel Sanjay Kumar Singh, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel was absent and no request for adjournment was made. The court observed that the applicant had not pursued the proceeding. Consequently, the court dismissed the contempt application for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced on 28 November 2025 by Justice Manish Kumar.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt application can proceed when the applicant’s counsel is absent and no adjournment is sought

Subjects

  • contempt
  • civil procedure
  • prosecution
  • adjournment
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                  LUCKNOW

                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1993 of 2024

                                     Smt. Soni Devi
                                                                                                   .....Applicant(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                     Dr. Surya Prakash Singh, Distt. Inspector Of Schools,
                                     Unnao                                                            .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Applicant(s)                      :   Sanjay Kumar Singh
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                 :

                                    Court No. - 8
                                                            HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.

                                    1. Case has been called in the revised list.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the applicant is neither present nor any request for the
                                    adjournment of the case has been made on behalf of the applicant.

                                    3. Accordingly, the present contempt application is dismissed for want of
                                    prosecution.

                                    November 28, 2025
                                    DiVYa
                                                                                               (Manish Kumar,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
DIVYA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.