Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHAILENDRA SINGH CHAUHANversusJ. RIBHA AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The contempt application was dismissed because the applicant's possession was not disturbed.

Summary

The applicant, Shailendra Singh Chauhan, filed a contempt application alleging disturbance of his possession. The State side submitted instructions, and the learned Assistant Chief Standing Counsel, Sri Prabhooti Kant Triapthi, affirmed that the applicant's possession had not been disturbed. The applicant's counsel, Rajendra Singh Chauhan, supported this statement. Based on these findings, the court concluded that there was no ground for contempt. Consequently, the contempt application and the contempt notice were dismissed and discharged.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant's possession was disturbed such that a contempt of court proceeding was warranted

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • possession
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2168 of 2026

                                    Shailendra Singh Chauhan
                                                                                              .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    J. Ribha And Another
                                                                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                                                       Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)              :    Rajendra Singh Chauhan
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)         :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Instructions have come from the State side which are taken on record.

                                    2. Sri Prabhooti Kant Triapthi, learned ACSC, states that possession of
                                    the applicant has not been disturbed.

                                    3. Learned counsel for applicant supported the statement made by learned
                                    ACSC.

                                    4. In view of the said fact, contempt application stands dismissed.
                                    Contempt notice stands discharged.



                                                                                  (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Shekhar




Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.