Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PRATAP CHANDRAversusSHRI RAHUL SINGH I, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 14

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is dismissed because the order of the writ court has been complied with, leaving no ground for contempt.

Summary

The applicant, Pratap Chandra, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court alleging that the opposite party, Additional District Judge Rahul Singh I, had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. The opposite party submitted instructions indicating that the writ court's order had been complied with, as the appeal in question was decided on 21 April 2026. The court examined the submission and found that the order had indeed been complied with. Consequently, the court held that there was no basis for a contempt proceeding. The contempt application was dismissed and the contempt notice discharged.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate legal basis for dismissing a contempt application when the order of the writ court has been complied with?

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ court
  • compliance
  • High Court
  • civil contempt

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2174 of 2026

                                    Pratap Chandra
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Shri Rahul Singh I, Additional District Judge 14
                                                                                                   .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Upadhyay Karan Dinanath, Vishesh
                                                                    Rajvanshi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Instructions have come from the side opposite which are taken on
                                    record.

                                    2. From the instructions sent by the officer concerned, it is clear that the
                                    order of writ Court has been complied with as appeal in question has been
                                    decided on 21.4.2026.

                                    3. As the order of writ Court has been complied with by the opposite
                                    party, no case for contempt is made out. Contempt application stands
                                    dismissed. Contempt notice stands discharged.

                                    4. Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of
                                    opposite party.



                                                                                   (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Shekhar




Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.