SHRI GAURAV SONDHIversusSMT POOJA RAJGADIYA

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
           CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2802 of 2026

Shri Gaurav Sondhi
                                                                    .....Applicant(s)
                                         Versus

Smt Pooja Rajgadiya
                                                                           .....Opposite
                                                                                 Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Ankur Singh Kushwaha, Pankaj Misra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :


Court No. - 9
                HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

1. According to learned counsel for the applicant, the opposite party had
earlier filed Matters under Article 227 No. 585 of 2025 seeking direction
to decide 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 287 of 2023. On
21.01.2025, the writ petition was disposed of and following order was
passed:-

     "This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon learned Civil
     Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to decide 6-C application filed
     in Original Suit No. 287 of 2023.
     As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the
     writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling
     for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a
     direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to decide
     6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 287 of 2023, in accordance with
     law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two
     months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
     With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
     It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit."

2. Thereafter, it appears that a modification application was preferred in
the said writ petition being Modification Application No. 3 of 2025 which
was disposed of on 01.05.2025 and the Court directed for deciding both
application filed for grant of temporary injunction 6-C as well as
application (Paper No. 46C) filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, which
                                                                  CAPL No. 2802 of 2026
                                    2


was pending consideration in the said suit.

3. It appears that the opposite party has again approached this Court
through Matters under Article 227 No. 2260 of 2026 seeking further
direction for concluding proceeding of 6-C application for grant of
temporary injunction application and the writ Court on 27.02.2026 passed
the following order:-

     "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
     2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
     "Issue an order or direction in the nature of directing the Civil Judge,
     (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to decide the application 6C filed by
     the petitioner in Original Suit No. 287 of 2023 (Smt. Pooja Rajgadiya vs.
     Shri Gaurav Sondhi and others) expeditiously by concluding day by day
     hearing within stipulated period. (Annexure No.2) to the petition."
     3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the
     aforesaid application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending
     since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have
     been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
     4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this
     petition pending.
     5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a
     direction to the Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to
     consider and decide the aforesaid application, in accordance with law,
     expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of
     production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all
     the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the
     parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to
     either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment."

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that two writ petitions have
been filed by opposite party seeking direction for deciding 6-C
application. According to him, the opposite party has not disclosed in the
subsequent writ petition filed as to direction issued on 21.01.2025.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and perusing the
material on record, I find that no case for contempt is made out under
                                                                                            CAPL No. 2802 of 2026
                                                                   3


                                    Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act.

                                    6. However, the applicant is at liberty to move a recall application in
                                    Matters under Article 227 No. 2260 of 2026 informing the Court and
                                    getting the order dated 27.02.2026 recalled.

                                    7. In view of said fact, the contempt application stands disposed of.



                                                                                    (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    (V. S. SINGH)




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad