Allahabad High Court
IBNE HARABversusSURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
The contempt petition is consigned to the record, leaving the matter open for the applicant to challenge the later order in the appropriate forum.
Summary
Ibne Harab filed a contempt petition alleging that Surendra Kumar Tiwari failed to comply with the order dated 25 July 2025 in Writ A No. 10085 of 2025, which required the opposite party to consider the applicant’s application. The opposite party produced an order dated 2 May 2026 deciding the claim, which the applicant did not dispute. The court directed that a copy of the instructions be served on the applicant’s counsel. Consequently, the contempt application was consigned to the record, allowing the applicant to challenge the 2 May 2026 order in the appropriate forum. The instructions filed were taken on record as Appendix‑A.
Issues considered
- Whether the opposite party’s order dated 2 May 2026 amounts to compliance with the earlier order dated 25 July 2025.
- Whether the contempt petition is maintainable in view of the production of the later order.
Subjects
- contempt of court
- non‑compliance of order
- writ petition
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2936 of 2026
Ibne Harab
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Surendra Kumar Tiwari
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aishwarya Kumar Singh, Rajesh
Kumar Singh, Utkarsh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 53
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing
Counsel.
2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-
compliance of the order dated 25.07.2025 passed in Writ A No. 10085 of
2025 which required the opposite party to consider the application of the
applicant.
3. Today Sri Yatindra has produced the order dated 02.05.2026, deciding
the claim.
4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned
counsel for the applicant.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record,
leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before
appropriate forum in accordance with law.
6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as
Appendix-A.
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
September 18, 2026
Ashu
Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…