Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ABHINANDAN BARNWALversusVIVEK SINGH, SUB INSPECTOR, POLICE STATION KHAMPUR

Decided

Holding

The court held that no case for contempt was made out.

Summary

The applicant, Abhinandan Barnwal, filed a civil contempt application against Sub Inspector Vivek Singh, alleging contempt of a prior writ order dated 11 December 2025. The High Court examined the writ order and the State’s reply, particularly paragraph 8 which set out the reasons for the alleged contempt. The court assessed whether the conduct of the Sub Inspector amounted to contempt of the earlier order. Upon review of the material, the bench found that the allegations did not satisfy the legal criteria for contempt. The court held that no case for contempt was made out. Consequently, the contempt application was dismissed as misconceived.

Issues considered

  • Whether the conduct of Sub Inspector Vivek Singh amounted to contempt of the writ order dated 11.12.2025

Subjects

  • civil contempt
  • contempt application
  • high court
  • writ order
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 339 of 2026

                                    Abhinandan Barnwal
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Vivek Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station
                                    Khampur                                                       .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                     :    Ashutosh Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                :

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                     HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Perused the order of the writ Court dated 11.12.2025 as well as reply
                                    filed by the State, wherein, in para 8, the reasons have been given.

                                    2. From the perusal of the material on record, I find that no case for
                                    contempt is made out.

                                    3. The contempt application is misconceived and stands dismissed.



                                                                                     (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    A. V. Singh




Digitally signed by :-
AJAY VIKRAM SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.