Allahabad High Court
RADHEY SHYAMversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV D.F.O.
- Decided
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Holding
The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous because the writ Court order had been complied with.
Summary
The applicant, Radhey Shyam, filed a contempt application against the respondent, D.F.O. Vikash Yadav, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ order had in fact been complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. The Court examined whether the contempt application should continue in light of the alleged compliance. Finding that the order of the writ Court had been fulfilled, the Court held that the contempt application was infructuous. Consequently, the Court dismissed the contempt application and discharged the contempt notice.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt application should proceed when the order of the writ Court has been complied with
Subjects
- contempt
- writ compliance
- dismissal
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3955 of 2024
Radhey Shyam
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Shri Vikash Yadav D.F.O.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bijendra Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Bijendra Kumar
Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant fairly states that the order of the
writ Court has been complied with and present contempt application has
become infructuous.
2. In view of the statement so made, present contempt application is
rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed.
3. Contempt notice stands discharged.
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
April 23, 2026
SK Goswami
Digitally signed by :-
SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…