Allahabad High Court
OM PRAKASH YADAVversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV
- Decided
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Holding
The contempt application is dismissed as infructuous because the writ Court order has been complied with.
Summary
In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 4003 of 2024, Om Prakash Yadav filed a contempt petition against Shri Vikash Yadav alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ Court order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt petition moot. The Court examined whether the petition retained any merit after the alleged compliance. Finding that the purpose of the petition was exhausted, the Court held the application infructuous. Consequently, the contempt application and the accompanying contempt notice were dismissed and discharged.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt application should proceed when the alleged breach of the writ Court order has been remedied.
Subjects
- civil contempt
- contempt application
- writ court order
- dismissal
- infructuous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4003 of 2024
Om Prakash Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Shri Vikash Yadav
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bijendra Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Bijendra Kumar
Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant fairly states that the order of the
writ Court has been complied with and present contempt application has
become infructuous.
2. In view of the statement so made, present contempt application is
rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed.
3. Contempt notice stands discharged.
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
April 23, 2026
SK Goswami
Digitally signed by :-
SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…