Allahabad High Court
RADHE SYAM YADAVversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV, DFO
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Holding
The contempt application is dismissed as infructuous because the writ order has been complied with.
Summary
Radhe Syam Yadav filed a civil contempt application against DFO Vikash Yadav, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. The court examined whether the application remained viable in light of the compliance. Finding that the purpose of the contempt proceeding was defeated, the court held the application infructuous. Consequently, the contempt application and the associated notice were dismissed and discharged.
Issues considered
- Whether the civil contempt application is maintainable when the alleged contempt has been remedied by compliance with the writ order.
Subjects
- civil contempt
- contempt of court
- writ compliance
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4100 of 2024
Radhe Syam Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Shri Vikash Yadav, Dfo
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bijendra Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Bijendra Kumar
Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant fairly states that the order of the
writ Court has been complied with and present contempt application has
become infructuous.
2. In view of the statement so made, present contempt application is
rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed.
3. Contempt notice stands discharged.
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
April 23, 2026
SK Goswami
Digitally signed by :-
SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…