Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUDINversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Decided

Holding

The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous because the writ court order had been complied with.

Summary

Sudin filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Shri Vikash Yadav, the Divisional Forest Officer, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ court's order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt proceedings unnecessary. The court examined the statement and concluded that the contempt application had become infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the contempt application and discharged the contempt notice. The decision underscores that once the underlying order is complied with, a contempt proceeding cannot continue.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt application should proceed when the order of the writ court has been complied with

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • writ compliance
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4106 of 2024

                                    Sudin
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Shri Vikash Yadav, Divisional Forest Officer
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                 :   Bijendra Kumar Mishra
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)            :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Bijendra Kumar
                                    Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant fairly states that the order of the
                                    writ Court has been complied with and present contempt application has
                                    become infructuous.

                                    2. In view of the statement so made, present contempt application is
                                    rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed.

                                    3. Contempt notice stands discharged.


                                                                                    (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    SK Goswami




Digitally signed by :-
SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.