Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA AND 37 OTHERSversusSRI L VENKETESHARLU, CHIEF/ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is dismissed as infructuous because the opposite party has complied with the writ court order.

Summary

The applicants, Jagdish Prasad Sharma and 37 others, filed a civil contempt application (No. 4194 of 2024) against Sri L Venketesharlu, Chief/Additional Chief Secretary. The application alleged that the opposite party had failed to comply with an earlier order of the writ court. The applicants’ counsel, Gopal Das Srivastava and Prabhat Kumar Tiwari, submitted that the opposite party had in fact complied with the writ court order. The learned judge, after hearing Advocate Anil Kumar Tiwari’s statement, accepted that compliance had been achieved. Consequently, the court held that the contempt proceedings were no longer necessary. The contempt notice was therefore discharged and the application dismissed as infructuous. No further directions were issued.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt application should be dismissed on the ground that the alleged contempt has been remedied by compliance with the writ court order?

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ court
  • compliance
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4194 of 2024

                                    Jagdish Prasad Sharma And 37 Others
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Sri L Venketesharlu, Chief/Additional Chief
                                    Secretary                                                      .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Gopal Das Srivastava, Prabhat Kumar
                                                                    Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Gopal Das
                                    Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, fairly states that the order
                                    of writ Court has been complied by the opposite party.

                                    2. In view of the statement, so made, contempt application stands
                                    dismissed as infructuous. Contempt notice stands discharged.


                                                                                   (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    Shekhar




Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.