Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAHENDRA SINGH AND 17 OTHERSversusCHANDNI SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The contempt petition is consigned to the record, pending the applicant’s further challenge of the order before the appropriate forum.

Summary

Mahendra Singh and 17 others filed a contempt petition against Chandni Singh and 2 others alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with the order dated 23 February 2026 in Writ C No. 41482 of 2025, which required them to consider the applicants' application. The court produced instructions dated 19 August 2026, which the applicant’s counsel did not dispute. The judge ordered that a copy of these instructions be served on the applicant’s counsel and consigned the contempt petition to the record, allowing the applicant to challenge the order in the appropriate forum. The instructions were taken on record as Appendix‑A. No final determination on contempt was made, leaving the matter open for further proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Did the opposite party comply with the order dated 23‑02‑2026 in Writ C No. 41482 of 2025?
  • Can the contempt petition proceed or must the applicant first challenge the order in the appropriate forum?

Subjects

  • contempt
  • civil procedure
  • non‑compliance
  • writ
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4651 of 2026

                                    Mahendra Singh And 17 Others
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    Chandni Singh And 2 Others
                                                                                                      .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)           :   Raj Kumar Srivastava, Shiv Poojan
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)      :

                                    Court No. - 53
                                                        HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing
                                    Counsel.
                                    2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance
                                    of the order dated 23.02.2026 passed in Writ C No. 41482 of 2025 which
                                    required the opposite party to consider the application of the applicant.
                                    3. Instructions have been produced annexing the order dated 19.08.2026.
                                    4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
                                    applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel
                                    for the applicant.
                                    5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record,
                                    leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before appropriate
                                    forum in accordance with law.
                                    6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as
                                    Appendix-A.
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Ashu
                                                                                        (Vikas Budhwar,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.