Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARPALversusSURAJ SINGH DIVISIONAL DIRECTOR SOCIAL FORESTRY

Decided

Holding

The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying order had been complied with.

Summary

In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 4943 of 2024, the applicant Harpal filed a contempt petition against Suraj Singh, Divisional Director Social Forestry. The applicant's counsel, Ramendra Kumar Shukla, informed the court that the order of the writ court had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt petition moot. The court examined whether a contempt proceeding could continue when the alleged breach had been remedied. Finding that the purpose of the contempt proceeding was defeated, the court held the application infructuous. Consequently, the contempt notice was discharged and the application dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt application should be dismissed when the order of the writ court has been complied with?

Subjects

  • civil contempt
  • writ compliance
  • contempt dismissal
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4943 of 2024

                                    Harpal
                                                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    Suraj Singh Divisional Director Social Forestry
                                                                                                .....Opposite
                                                                                                      Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                :   Ramendra Kumar Shukla
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)           :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Ramendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant states
                                    that the order of the writ Court has been complied with and present
                                    contempt application has become infructuous.

                                    2. In view of the statement so made, present contempt application is
                                    rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed.

                                    3. Contempt notice stands discharged.



                                                                                   (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 14, 2026
                                    SK Goswami




Digitally signed by :-
SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.