Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM CHARANversusSRI SHISHIV KUMAR, PRESENTLY POSTED AT UP-ZILADHIKARI KHAIR AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is consigned to the record, allowing the applicant to approach the appropriate forum for further relief.

Summary

The applicant, Ram Charan, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite parties failed to comply with an order dated 05-08-2025 in Writ C No. 21683 of 2022, which required them to consider his application. The court examined the instructions and the exchange of orders dated 10-06-2026, which the applicant did not dispute. The court ordered that a copy of the instructions be served on the applicant's counsel and recorded the instructions as Appendix-A. The contempt application was consigned to the record, leaving it open for the applicant to challenge the order before the appropriate forum. No substantive finding on contempt was made, and the matter was left for further proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the opposite parties' failure to act on the order dated 05-08-2025 constitutes contempt of court
  • Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed or consigned to the record for further action

Subjects

  • contempt
  • non-compliance
  • writ petition
  • High Court
  • instructions
  • order enforcement

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5010 of 2026

                                    Ram Charan
                                                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    Sri Shishiv Kumar, Presently Posted At Up-
                                    Ziladhikari Khair And Another                               .....Opposite
                                                                                                      Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                  :   Krishna Dev Mishra
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)             :

                                    Court No. - 53
                                                       HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing
                                    Counsel.
                                    2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-
                                    compliance of the order dated 05.08.2025 passed in Writ C No. 21683 of
                                    2022 which required the opposite party to consider the application of the
                                    applicant.
                                    3. Today instructions have been produced and exchange there with order
                                    dated 10/6/2026 .
                                    4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
                                    applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned
                                    counsel for the applicant.
                                    5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record,
                                    leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before
                                    appropriate forum in accordance with law.
                                    6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as
                                    Appendix-A.


                                                                                         (Vikas Budhwar,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Ashu




Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.