Allahabad High Court
DHIRENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYversusBHUPENDRA SINGH DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
The contempt application is consigned to the record as the writ order has been complied with.
Summary
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party had failed to comply with the order dated 29‑01‑2026 in Writ‑A No.1092 of 2026, which required consideration of the applicant's claim. The court examined the instructions produced, which showed an order dated 05‑09‑2026 deciding the applicant's representation, thereby indicating compliance with the writ order. Consequently, the court held that the original writ order had been fulfilled. The court directed that a copy of the instructions be supplied to the applicant's counsel and recorded the instructions as Appendix‑A. The contempt application was consigned to the record, leaving it open for the applicant to raise any further questions before the appropriate forum. The Vakalatnama of the opposite party’s counsel was also taken on record.
Issues considered
- Whether the alleged non‑compliance with the writ order of 29‑01‑2026 constitutes contempt of court.
- Whether the contempt application should be dismissed on the ground that the writ order has been complied with.
Subjects
- contempt
- writ jurisdiction
- order compliance
- High Court of Allahabad
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5197 of 2026
Dhirendra Kumar Upadhyay
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Bhupendra Singh District Basic Education Officer
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi, Samarath Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 53
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging non-
compliance of the order dated 29.01.2026 passed in Writ-A No.1092 of
2026, whereby the claim/representation of the applicant was to be
considered by the opposite party.
2. Today, instructions have been produced containing the order dated
05.09.2026, deciding the representation of the applicant/writ petitioner.
3. Once the position being so, the order of the Writ Court has been
complied with.
4. Let a copy of the instructions be supplied to the learned counsel for the
applicant.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record, l
eaving it open for the applicant to question the same before appropriate
forum.
6. Instructions filed today is taken on record and marked as Appendix-A.
7. Vakalatnama of Sri Akhilesh Kumar Sharma (A/A0392/12), filed today
on behalf of opposite party is taken on record. His name be shown as
from the side of opposite party.
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
September 8, 2026
Prachi
Digitally signed by :-
PRACHI KESARWANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…