Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ASHOK KUMARversusSRI RAJEEV KRISHNA AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The contempt petition was consigned to the record without further adjudication.

Summary

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents failed to comply with a Supreme Court order dated 12 November 2013 in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. The petition was supported by an FIR dated 20 August 2026. The respondent counsel did not contest the facts presented. The High Court noted the FIR and the uncontested nature of the allegation, ordered that a copy of the FIR be served on the applicant's counsel, and then consigned the contempt application to the record. The instructions accompanying the FIR were taken on record as Appendix‑A.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents' alleged non‑compliance with the Supreme Court order constitutes contempt of court

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • non‑compliance
  • Supreme Court order
  • FIR
  • High Court procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5584 of 2026

                                    Ashok Kumar
                                                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Sri Rajeev Krishna And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Opposite
                                                                                                      Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)         : Roma Seth, Santosh Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)    :


                                    Court No. - 53
                                                       HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

                                    2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-
                                    compliance of the order dated 12.11.2013 passed by this Hon'ble Apex
                                    Court in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 68 of 2008 (Lalita Kumari Vs. State
                                    of U.P. and others) reported in (2014) 2 SCC.

                                    3. Today instructions have been produced appending therewith an FIR
                                    lodged on 20.08.2026 being FIR No. 0156 of 2026.

                                    4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
                                    applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned
                                    counsel for the applicant.

                                    5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record.

                                    6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as
                                    Appendix-A.


                                                                                         (Vikas Budhwar,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Ashu




Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.