Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PAWAN GIHARversusSMT. ARTI SINGH AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The court held that the contempt petition should be consigned to the record pending further proceedings.

Summary

Pawan Gihar filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents failed to comply with a court order dated 04‑12‑2014 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 and with a Supreme Court directive in Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. An FIR (No. 0159 of 2026) dated 08‑09‑2026 was produced to support the allegation. The applicant’s counsel did not dispute the FIR. The court directed that a copy of the FIR be served on the applicant’s counsel and that the contempt petition be consigned to the record. The instructions accompanying the FIR were taken on record as Appendix‑A. No further order on the merits of contempt was made, and the petition remains pending in the record.

Issues considered

  • Whether the alleged non‑compliance of the 04‑12‑2014 order and the Supreme Court directive amounts to contempt of court

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • non‑compliance of order
  • FIR
  • civil writ
  • Supreme Court directive

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5666 of 2026

                                    Pawan Gihar
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    Smt. Arti Singh And Another
                                                                                                   .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Narendra Kumar Singh, Radhey Shyam
                                                                    Yadav
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

                                    Court No. - 53
                                                        HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

                                    2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance
                                    of the order dated 04.12.2014 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Civil Misc.
                                    Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Smt. Razeena bano and others Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Others reported in 2015 (2) ADJ 232 and judgment and
                                    order dated 12.11.2013 passed by Apex Court in case of Lalita Kumari
                                    Versus Government of U.P. and others reported in [SCC ( Crl .) , 2014 (1)
                                    (524).

                                    3. Today instructions have been produced appending therewith an FIR
                                    lodged on 08.09.2026 being FIR No. 0159 of 2026.

                                    4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
                                    applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel
                                    for the applicant.

                                    5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record.

                                    6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as
                                    Appendix-A.
                                    September 24, 2026
                                    Ashu
                                                                                        (Vikas Budhwar,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.