Allahabad High Court
GUDDI DEVIversusSHRI ABHISHEK KUMAR, CIVIL JUDGE (S.D.)/ FAST TRACK COURT
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
The contempt petition is consigned to the record, leaving the matter open for the applicant to approach the appropriate forum for relief.
Summary
The applicant, Guddi Devi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Shri Abhishek Kumar, failed to comply with a High Court order dated 10 November 2025 under Article 227, which required him to consider the applicant's application. The court examined the instructions produced by the respondent's counsel, which indicated that the 6-C application was decided on 15 September 2026. The applicant's counsel did not dispute this fact. Consequently, the court directed that a copy of the instructions be served on the applicant's counsel and consigned the contempt petition to the record, allowing the applicant to challenge the order in the appropriate forum. No further punitive action was taken pending such challenge.
Issues considered
- Whether the opposite party's failure to act on the High Court order dated 10-11-2025 constitutes contempt of court
Subjects
- contempt of court
- Article 227
- non‑compliance with court order
- civil procedure
- High Court of Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5872 of 2026
Guddi Devi
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Shri Abhishek Kumar, Civil Judge (S.D.)/ Fast Track
Court .....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Pandey, Deepak Gaur
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Srivastava (Senior Advocate)
Court No. - 53
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing
Counsel.
2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance
of the order dated 10.11.2025 passed in Matters under Article 227 No. 13654
of 2025 which required the opposite party to consider the application of the
applicant.
3. Today, instructions have been produced by Shri Rahul Shrivastav which
are also available on record, according to which, the 6-C application stands
decided on 15.09.2026.
4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel
for the applicant.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record,
leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before appropriate
forum in accordance with law.
September 24, 2026
Ashu
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…