Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGHversusRAVINDRA KUMAR MANDER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is dismissed because the order of the writ court has been complied with.

Summary

The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate, Ravindra Kumar Mander, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Prashant Sharma. The respondent had no counsel appearing. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant submitted that the order of the writ court had been fully complied with. The learned judge accepted this statement as conclusive. Consequently, the contempt application was dismissed and the contempt notice was discharged. The judgment was delivered on May 14, 2026 by Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt application should be entertained when the order of the writ court has been complied with

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ court order
  • compliance
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5926 of 2024

                                    Dharmendra Kumar Singh
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Ravindra Kumar Mander, District Magistrate
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                      :     Prashant Sharma
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                 :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Upendra Malviya, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Prashant Sharma,
                                    learned counsel for the applicant, fairly states that order of writ Court has
                                    been complied with.

                                    2. In view of statement, so made, contempt application stands dismissed.
                                    Contempt notice stands discharged.


                                                                                      (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 14, 2026
                                    Shekhar




Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.