Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

CHETAN ANAND BHARTIversusSRI DR. CHANDRA BHUSHAN MANAGING DIRECTOR

Decided

Holding

The contempt application was disposed of, with the opposite party given six weeks to comply with the original order and no contempt finding made at this stage.

Summary

The applicant, Chetan Anand Bharti, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sri Dr. Chandra Bhushan, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 10 December 2025 in Writ‑A No.18610 of 2025. The order required the opposite party to comply with certain directions, which, according to the applicant, have not been fulfilled despite service of the order. The court examined whether a prima facie case of contempt existed and considered procedural requirements such as issuing notice. While it found a prima facie case, the court declined to issue a notice at this stage and instead granted the opposite party six weeks to comply. The court directed the applicant to provide stamped envelopes for service of the order and contempt application, and ordered that the opposite party must comply and inform the applicant within a stipulated period. If compliance is not achieved, the applicant may approach the court again. The contempt application was therefore disposed of without a contempt finding.

Issues considered

  • Whether the opposite party's failure to comply with the order dated 10‑12‑2025 constitutes willful disobedience amounting to contempt of court.
  • Whether notice should be issued to the opposite party before proceeding with contempt proceedings.

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • willful disobedience
  • writ petition
  • compliance order
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • procedural direction

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
           CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6083 of 2026

Chetan Anand Bharti
                                                          .....Applicant(s)
                                  Versus

Sri Dr. Chandra Bhushan Managing Director
                                                             .....Opposite
                                                                   Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)               :   Dr. Ashish Kumar Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)          :

Court No. - 53
                   HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2. The present contempt application has been filed for punishing the
Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated
order dated 10.12.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court, in Writ-A No.18610
of 2025.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant
had filed the aforesaid writ petition, which was disposed of vide order
dated 10.12.2025. Copy of the order was served but till date the order of
writ Court has not been complied with.

4. Prima facie, a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party
for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the aforesaid
writ petition.

5. However, no notice is issued to the opposite party at this stage. The
opposite party is granted six weeks further time to comply with the order
dated 10.12.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court, in Writ-A No.18610 of
2025 from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

6. The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope
addressed to the opposite parties and another self-addressed envelope to
the office within two weeks from today. The office shall send a copy of
this order along with the self-addressed envelope of the applicant with a
copy of contempt application to the opposite parties within one week
                                                                                           CAPL No. 6083 of 2026
                                                                   2


                                    thereafter and keep a record thereof.

                                    7. The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ court
                                    and intimate the applicant the order through the self-addressed envelop
                                    within a week thereafter.

                                    8. In case, the opposite party does not comply with the order, it would be
                                    open to the applicant to approach this court again.

                                    9. With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of
                                    at this stage.



                                                                                          (Vikas Budhwar,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Ashu




Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.