Allahabad High Court
JUGUL KISHOREversusSRI RAJ KUMAR PANDIT BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI AMETHI DISTT. AM
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
- Bench
- MANISH KUMAR
Holding
The contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Jugul Kishore, filed a civil contempt application (No. 627 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to enforce a notice that matters listed as 'These matters shall not be adjourned' must be decided in the first round without revision. The court had posted a notice outside the courtroom emphasizing this requirement. On the scheduled date, the applicant's counsel was absent and no request for adjournment was made on his behalf. The court observed that without any prosecution or representation, the contempt application could not proceed. Consequently, the court dismissed the contempt application for want of prosecution and discharged any notice that might have been issued.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt application can be entertained in the absence of the applicant's counsel and without any request for adjournment.
- Whether the procedural requirement of prosecution is essential for the continuation of a contempt proceeding.
Subjects
- contempt of court
- adjournment
- procedural default
- court notice
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 627 of 2017
Jugul Kishore
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Sri Raj Kumar Pandit Basic Shiksha Adhikari
Amethi Distt. Am .....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjani Kumar Dvivedi, Mahendra
Bahadur Singh, Raj Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Prashant
Arora
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out.
The present case is listed under the heading "These matters shall not be
adjourned".
A notice has been pasted outside the Court room prescribing that the
matters listed under the heading "These matters shall not be adjourned"
shall not be revised and appropriate orders shall be passed in the first
round itself.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request
has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
In view of the above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
October 17, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…