Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KUMAR SHIVAMversusSHRI ABHISHEK VERMA, AT PRESENT POSTED AS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The contempt petition was consigned to the record without a substantive ruling on the alleged non‑compliance.

Summary

The applicant, Kumar Shivam, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including Superintendent of Police Shri Abhishek Verma, failed to comply with an order issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano & Another v. State of U.P. & others). The court received instructions and a copy of FIR No. 0180 dated 25‑09‑2026, which the applicant did not dispute. The court directed that the instructions be served on the applicant’s counsel. No substantive hearing on the merits of the contempt allegation was conducted, and the petition was merely consigned to the record for further consideration. The instructions were taken on record as Appendix‑A.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents have committed civil contempt by failing to comply with the order in Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014

Subjects

  • civil contempt
  • non‑compliance
  • FIR
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • contempt petition

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6348 of 2026

                                    Kumar Shivam
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Shri Abhishek Verma, At Present Posted As
                                    Superintendent Of Police And Another                           .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Nitish Ranjan Rajauria, Ram Autar
                                                                    Verma, Yogesh Kumar Verma
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

                                    Court No. - 53
                                                          HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

                                    2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance
                                    of the order passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena
                                    Bano & Another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) reported in (2015) (2) ADJ
                                    2323.

                                    3. Today instructions have been produced containing therewith a copy of the
                                    FIR dated 25.09.2026 being FIR No. 0180.

                                    4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
                                    applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel
                                    for the applicant.

                                    5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record.

                                    6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as
                                    Appendix-A.



                                                                                           (Vikas Budhwar,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    N.S.Rathour




Digitally signed by :-
NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.