Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARUN KUMAR PANDEYversusSHRIKRISHN UPADHYAY, ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (PANCHAYAT) VIKAS KHAND MAJHAWAN

Decided

Holding

The contempt application was dismissed as the writ Court order had been complied with.

Summary

The applicant, Arun Kumar Pandey, filed a civil contempt application (No. 648 of 2025) against Shrikrishn Upadhyay, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. Counsel for the applicant, Adv. Paritosh Sukla (with Shashwat Shukla), submitted that the writ Court order had been fully complied with. The judge accepted this statement, finding no basis for contempt. Consequently, the contempt application was dismissed and the contempt notice discharged. The decision reflects the principle that compliance with a court order negates contempt liability.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondent's alleged conduct amounted to contempt of the writ Court order

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ jurisdiction
  • order compliance
  • High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
  • civil contempt application

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 648 of 2025

                                    Arun Kumar Pandey
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    Shrikrishn Upadhyay, Assistant Development
                                    Officer (Panchayat) Vikas Khand Majhawan                       .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)             :   Paritosh Sukla, Shashwat Shukla
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)        :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                       HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Aavesh Mishra, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Paritosh Sukla,
                                    learned counsel for the applicant fairly states that order of writ Court has
                                    been complied with.

                                    2. In view of statement so made, the contempt application stands
                                    dismissed.

                                    3. Contempt notice stands discharged.



                                                                                     (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    (V. S. SINGH)




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.