Allahabad High Court
M/S CHANDRA CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusAMIT KUMAR GHOSH - SECRETARY, MEDICAL AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT U.P AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
The contempt application is consigned to the record, permitting the applicant to seek redress in the appropriate forum.
Summary
The applicant, M/s Chandra Construction Company, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Amit Kumar Ghosh, failed to comply with an order dated 26.08.2025 in Writ C No. 29152 of 2025, which required consideration of the applicant's application. The court noted that the opposite party's standing counsel produced instructions and a copy of a subsequent order dated 14.11.2025, though no formal notice was issued. The applicant did not dispute the existence of these instructions. The court directed that a copy of the instructions be served on the applicant's counsel and consigned the contempt application to the record, allowing the applicant to challenge the order in the appropriate forum. The instructions were taken on record as Appendix‑A.
Issues considered
- Whether the opposite party's failure to comply with the order dated 26.08.2025 amounts to contempt of court
Subjects
- contempt
- non‑compliance
- writ
- High Court
- civil contempt
- order
- instructions
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6507 of 2026
M/S Chandra Construction Company
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Amit Kumar Ghosh - Secretary, Medical And
Health Department U.P And Another .....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Krishna, Abhishek Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 53
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing
Counsel.
2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-
compliance of the order dated 26.08.2025 passed in Writ C No. 29152 of
2025 which required the opposite party to consider the application of the
applicant.
3. Today instructions have been produced by Shri Pawan Kumar, learned
Standing Counsel, though notices were not issued. However, he submits
that he has obtained instructions annexing therewith the copy of the order
dated 14.11.2025.
4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the
applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned
counsel for the applicant.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record,
leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before
appropriate forum in accordance with law.
6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as
Appendix-A.
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
September 18, 2026
Ashu
Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…