Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAIYADEENversusSRI ARPIT UPADHYAY COMMISSIONER

Decided

Holding

The contempt application was consigned to the record as the order of the writ court had been substantially complied with.

Summary

The applicant, Maiyadeen, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a February 20, 2026 order issued in Writ‑A No. 2560 of 2026. The court heard the matter without giving notice to the opposite party, and counsel for the opposite party, Sri Munna Pandey, produced a September 28, 2026 order showing that the applicant’s representation had been decided. The court observed that the order of the writ court had been substantially complied with. Consequently, the contempt application was consigned to the record, allowing the applicant to raise any further questions in an appropriate forum. The court directed that a copy of the instructions be served on the applicant’s counsel and recorded the instructions as Appendix ‘A’.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant’s conduct amounted to willful defiance of the February 20, 2026 order, thereby attracting contempt proceedings

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ
  • order compliance
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6859 of 2026

                                    Maiyadeen
                                                                                                   .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Sri Arpit Upadhyay Commissioner
                                                                                                      .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                               :     Ravi Sahu
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                          :


                                    Court No. - 53
                                                          HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging willful
                                    defiance of the order dated 20.02.2026 passed in Writ-A No. 2560 of 2026.

                                    2. Today, when the matter was taken up without there being any notice to the
                                    opposite party, Sri Munna Pandey, learned counsel has appeared before this
                                    Court and produced an order dated 28.09.2026 deciding the representation of
                                    the applicant.

                                    3. Since the order of the Writ-Court has been substantially complied with,
                                    the contempt application is consigned to record, leaving it open for the
                                    applicant to question the same before appropriate forum.

                                    4. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the counsel for the applicant.

                                    5. Instructions filed today are taken on record and marked as Appendix 'A'.



                                                                                               (Vikas Budhwar,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    N.S.Rathour




Digitally signed by :-
NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.