Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DAYA NAND CHANDversusRAM JIYAWAN MAURYA, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is infructuous and is dismissed, and the contempt notice is discharged.

Summary

The applicant, Daya Nand Chand, filed a civil contempt application against Ram Jiyawan Maurya, a District Basic Education Officer, for allegedly failing to comply with a writ court order directing payment of a sum with interest. The writ court had ordered the officer to pay a principal amount, which had already been paid, and interest. On 15 April 2026, the High Court framed contempt charges for non‑payment of the interest. The officer later paid the interest of Rs 11,800 on 24 April 2026, and submitted an affidavit of compliance. The court held that the payment satisfied the writ order, rendering the contempt application infructuous, and consequently dismissed the contempt proceedings and discharged the notice.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt application should stand after the officer complied with the writ court's order by paying the principal and the interest.

Subjects

  • civil contempt
  • writ compliance
  • payment of interest
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • District Basic Education Officer

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6940 of 2025

                                    Daya Nand Chand
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Ram Jiyawan Maurya, District Basic Education
                                    Officer And Another                                             .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                         :    Grijesh Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                    :

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Mr Ram Jiyawan Maurya, District Basic Education Officer, Kushinagar is
                                    present in the Court today, who is identified by Sri P.D. Tripathi, learned
                                    counsel appearing for opposite party.

                                    2. An affidavit of compliance has been filed today, which is taken on record.

                                    3. On the last occasion on 15.04.2026, charges were framed against the
                                    officer for non-compliance of the order passed by the writ Court.

                                    4. Learned counsel for the opposite party states that the order of the writ
                                    Court has already been complied to the extent that the amount as awarded by
                                    the writ Court was paid to the applicant, except the interest which has now
                                    been paid on 24.04.2026.

                                    5. As principal amount was already paid earlier and the interest of
                                    Rs.11,800/- has been paid on 24.04.2026, contempt application is rendered
                                    infructuous and the same stands dismissed.

                                    6. Contempt notice stands discharged.



                                                                                    (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    SK Goswami




Digitally signed by :-
SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.