Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BLIRAMversusSRI PRATAP SINHG BAGHEL AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous because the order of the writ court had been complied with.

Summary

The High Court, while disposing of Writ-A No. 14196 of 2025 on 19 September 2025, directed the opposite party to decide the representation of the applicant. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit stating that the representation was decided on 13 April 2026. The court held that since the original order had been complied with, the pending contempt application became infructuous. Consequently, the contempt application was dismissed and the contempt notice discharged. The court noted that the applicant may still challenge the opposite party's order in the appropriate forum if advised.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt application remains maintainable after the order of the writ court has been complied with

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • compliance affidavit
  • writ jurisdiction
  • dismissal of contempt

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7274 of 2025

                                    Bliram
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Sri Pratap Sinhg Baghel And Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Faizul Hasan,            Mahboob       Ahmad
                                                                    Siddiqui
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                     HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. The writ Court on 19.09.2025 while disposing of Writ-A No. 14196 of
                                    2025 had required the opposite party to decide the representation of the
                                    applicant.

                                    2. Today, a compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein, it is contended that
                                    the representation has been decided on 13.04.2026, copy of which has been
                                    appended as Annexure No. 1 to the compliance affidavit.

                                    3. In view of said fact, as the order of writ Court has been complied with, the
                                    present contempt application is rendered infructuous and stands dismissed.

                                    4. Contempt notice stands discharged.

                                    5. However, it is open to the applicant to assail the order passed by opposite
                                    party before the appropriate forum, if so advised.



                                                                                     (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    A. V. Singh




Digitally signed by :-
AJAY VIKRAM SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.