Allahabad High Court
CHANDER SEN RATHOREversusSRI ANIL KUMAR, REGIOANL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, BAREILLY
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
- Bench
- SAURABH LAVANIA
Holding
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Chander Sen Rathore, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the applicant and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to postpone the hearing. Accordingly, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The notice, if any, was discharged.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt application can be dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant's counsel is absent and no adjournment is sought
Subjects
- contempt
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
- civil contempt
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 808 of 2025
Chander Sen Rathore
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Sri Anil Kumar, Regioanl Provident Fund
Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, Bareilly .....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Salik Ram Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Pratap Singh
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request
has been made on his behalf to adjourn the case.
In view of the aforesaid, the present case is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
November 25, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…