Allahabad High Court
BHARATDWAJversusVASDEV and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
- Bench
- SAURABH LAVANIA
Holding
The petition was dismissed in default due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
Summary
In Civil Revision No. 84 of 2019, the revisionist Bharatdwaj filed a petition against Vasdev and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and there was no request for adjournment. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the petition in default on 10 July 2024. The judgment reflects the procedural rule that a petition may be dismissed if the petitioner fails to appear. No substantive legal issues were addressed beyond the procedural default.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear before the court in a civil revision proceeding?
Subjects
- default judgment
- civil revision
- non-appearance
- procedural law
Judgment
Court No. - 19
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 84 of 2019
Revisionist :- Bharatdwaj
Opposite Party :- Vasdev And Ors.
Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajesh Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Daya Shanker Tripathi
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor there is any request
for pass over or adjournment of the case.
Petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 10.7.2024
Ashish
Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…