Allahabad High Court
VIPIN GARGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The review application is not maintainable and is dismissed.
Summary
Vipin Garg filed a civil review application (No. 177 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a reasoned judgment. The applicant, though filing in person, was not present before the court. The bench observed that the judgment under review was reasoned and, relying on the precedent set in Sanjay Kumar Agarwal v. State Tax Officer & Anr. (2024 (2) SCC 362), held that no ground for a review existed. Consequently, the review application was dismissed. The decision underscores that a reasoned judgment cannot be reopened absent a specific error or new evidence.
Issues considered
- Whether a review of a reasoned judgment is maintainable under the circumstances presented.
Subjects
- review application
- reasoned judgment
- maintainability
- civil procedure
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 177 of 2026
Vipin Garg
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : In Person
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. This Review Application is filed by applicant-in-person, however he is
not present. Otherwise, judgment under review is a reasoned judgment,
therefore, in light of Sanjay Kumar Agarwal Vs. State Tax Officer &
Anr. 2024 (2) SCC 362, no case of review is made out.
2. Present Review application is accordingly dismissed.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
September 30, 2026
SB
Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…