Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAVINDRAversusCHARU APRAIL PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

A review can be granted only if an error is apparent on the face of the record; none was found, so the review was dismissed.

Summary

The applicant, Ravindra, filed a civil miscellaneous review application (No. 90 of 2026) challenging an order dated 21 April 2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court examined whether the limited scope of review jurisdiction permitted reopening the matter on its merits. It held that review is permissible only when an error is apparent on the face of the record. Since no such apparent error was identified, the court concluded that the review application could not be entertained. Consequently, the application was dismissed. The judgment underscores the restrictive nature of review jurisdiction in civil proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a review of its own order dated 21 April 2026.
  • Whether an error apparent on the face of the record exists to justify the grant of review.

Subjects

  • review jurisdiction
  • civil procedure
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • order dismissal
  • apparent error

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 90 of 2026

                                    Ravindra
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    Charu Aprail Private Limited And Another
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)          :    Gulab Chandra Tiwari, Santosh Singh
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)     :

                                    Court No. - 90
                                                         HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

                                    2. This Court passed a well-considered order on 21.04.2026. The scope of
                                    review jurisdiction is extremely limited. Unless an error is apparent on the
                                    face of the record, the matter cannot be reopened for re-hearing on merits.

                                    3. In view thereof, the review application is liable to be dismissed and is
                                    accordingly dismissed.

                                    September 7, 2026
                                    K.K. Maurya
                                                                                              (Abdul Shahid,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.