Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AKASH @ PUNITA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The appeal was dismissed as not pressed because the appellant withdrew it.

Summary

An appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 10124 of 2025) was filed by Akash @ Punita and another against the State of U.P. The appellant's counsel, Sandeep Pandey, informed the court that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the criminal appeal. Counsel for the respondent and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to this request. Consequently, the High Court of Allahabad dismissed the appeal as not pressed. No substantive issues were examined, and the certified copy of the order was to be returned to the appellant's counsel after retaining a photocopy for the record.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • dismissal of appeal
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                      CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 10124 of 2025

                                    Akash @ Punita And Another
                                                                                                    .....Appellant(s)
                                                                         Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)                      :   Sandeep Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :   G.A., Gaurav Srivastav

                                    Court No. - 51
                                                         HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.

                                    1. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the appellants, learned
                                    counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. are present.

                                    2. After matter was argued at some length, learned counsel for the appellants
                                    submits that he does not want to press the present criminal appeal and
                                    therefore, the same may be dismissed as not.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. have no
                                    objection to the above submission.

                                    4. This criminal appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.

                                    5. Certified copy of the orders enclosed along with the present criminal shall
                                    be returned to the learned counsel for the appellant after retaining the photo
                                    copies of the same to be kept on record.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Sushil/-
                                                                                              (Madan Pal Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.